🔐📎🧠 When “123456” becomes reality – a heckle at lived security culture

Image generated by OpenAI's DALL·E

---

In the world of cybersecurity, there's a lot of talk about zero-day exploits, APTs, and attacks with the potential to cause millions of dollars in damage. But sometimes it's the simple things that reveal more about the state of our security culture than any complex scenario.

A real wake-up call: According to Wired , security researchers were able to guess the admin access to the AI hiring platform "McHire" using the password "123456," potentially gaining access to around 64 million applicant chat data .

Public access to McDonald's AI-based application platform McHire – with the username admin and password 123456. No MFA. No limits. No technical protection mechanism. The platform was linked to real application data. According to estimates, up to 64 million .

It's not a sophisticated attack chain or a complex exploit. Rather, it's an everyday example, and that's precisely what makes it so relevant.

Security begins with conscious action

A previous post was about exactly that:

“ Security begins with switching off the brain – and real awareness with conscious action ”

What I formulated as a reflection back then is shown here in a real case.

A test system remains productively accessible, with weak access data – and nobody notices OR nobody questions it.

It's an example of automated behavior in a technical environment that is no longer actively monitored. It's a situation in which security standards exist but aren't always enforced.

Between policy and reality

In almost all organizations there are:

• Security policies

• Awareness training

• Password requirements

• Access controls

  
  

The question is no longer whether such measures are defined. The question is: Who checks whether they are effective in everyday life?

Because this is precisely where the blind spot lies: If test systems remain in the live infrastructure, if default passwords are not removed, if MFA is not configured – then this is not a technical problem, but a cultural one.

The difference lies in behavior

Security awareness isn't reflected in the final report or the PDF document of a policy. It's reflected in everyday decisions:

• Is a password set generically – or is it really secured?

• Is a system deactivated after testing – or does it simply remain in place?

• Is MFA seen as the norm – or as an exception?

  
  

The case shows: If no control, no review, no safety impulse is anchored in daily actions, even guidelines will not help.

Then security remains an item on a checklist – but not part of the lived culture.

A technical detail? Perhaps.

But above all a mirror of reality

Access to McHire was discovered by security researchers, not attackers. The platform was secured after it became known.

This is important – and right.

But beyond the immediate reaction, a fundamental insight remains:

Such incidents are not exceptions. They are visible symptoms of everyday patterns.

And that is precisely why this case is relevant:

Because it shows that security emerges where awareness begins. Where policies not only exist but are also internalized, and where responsibility is not delegated but shaped.

Conclusion

"123456" isn't just a weak password. It's a symbol. It symbolizes routine, a lack of control, and a security approach that ends at the surface.

And let's be honest: Who hasn't used a password like this before – whether for testing, due to time constraints, or out of convenience?

The case is not a cause for alarm – but rather an occasion for self-reflection:

• How is security practiced in your own environment?

• What remains after the test run?

• And above all: Is what is defined actually checked?

  
  

Because ultimately, security isn't created by technology, but by conscious action.